Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Fri Aug 15, 2025 9:54 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 6:19 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 6:47 pm
Posts: 153
First name: john
Last Name: smith
City: hemet
State: ca
Zip/Postal Code: 92543
Country: usa
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
So Ed, with your set up is the deflection you usually aim for .25" ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 7:18 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:15 pm
Posts: 7555
First name: Ed
Last Name: Bond
City: Nanaimo
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
No, less. .200 is probably a better starting point, then assess and adjust accordingly...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 8:56 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:17 am
Posts: 1292
First name: John
Last Name: Arnold
City: Newport
State: TN
Zip/Postal Code: 37821
Country: USA
Focus: Repair
Status: Professional
Quote:
Might also use 5/16" bracing instead of the usual 1/4"...

12 strings often have 3/8" bracing.

_________________
John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 08, 2014 9:17 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:15 pm
Posts: 7555
First name: Ed
Last Name: Bond
City: Nanaimo
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Went with 5/16. According to preliminary data, I should be pretty close to right on the money...I'll know more in a few weeks...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 5:42 am 
Offline
Mahogany
Mahogany

Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2014 3:57 pm
Posts: 85
First name: Michael
Last Name: Lee
City: Albany Creek
State: QLD
Zip/Postal Code: 4035
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Trevor Gore wrote:
I must encourage you to look in that big black book more often, Ed!

Trevor, after seeing many references to the books, I decided to do some checking. I have several books bought in the last few years, but a week ago bought your books. At the cost they are the best value for money. Now I might actually understand rather than blindly following plans. As a member of AAMIM I will be sharing my find at the next meeting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 10:10 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:15 pm
Posts: 7555
First name: Ed
Last Name: Bond
City: Nanaimo
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
They're awesome!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Oct 11, 2014 6:05 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
meddlingfool wrote:
They're awesome!

Thanks, Ed!
Mike2E wrote:
Trevor, after seeing many references to the books, I decided to do some checking. I have several books bought in the last few years, but a week ago bought your books. At the cost they are the best value for money. Now I might actually understand rather than blindly following plans. As a member of AAMIM I will be sharing my find at the next meeting.

Thanks, Mike! Make sure you take yours home with you !

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 1:54 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:12 pm
Posts: 6994
First name: Mike
Last Name: O'Melia
City: Huntsville
State: Alabama
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
J De Rocher wrote:
I was curious enough about this that I set up a deflection rig like Ed's and did the test using an unsanded spruce plate (0.175 thick), a dial gauge, and two weights labeled as being 3 lbs each but were actually 3.6 and 3.7 lbs.

3.6 lb, deflection = 0.107
7.3 lb, deflection = 0.185


The deflection will be linear up to a point, then it will become non-linear. You passed the point of linearity in your test. Try 1 lb, then 2, then 3, etc. Plot it out. Back in my college days, this was covered under something called "Strength of Materials".

Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 2:50 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2012 12:47 pm
Posts: 2580
First name: Jay
Last Name: De Rocher
City: Bothell
State: Washington
I'm sure you're right about linearity at small deflections. From what I've read, it seems that the weights people use for this are in the neighborhood of five pounds. I didn't want to double that to ten pounds because I expected it would give very non-linear results. I chose those weights to bracket five pounds. It would be interesting to know at about what amount of deflection the transition to non-linearity occurs with a setup like Ed's. It seems there would be a sweet spot where the deflections would be in the linear range and be big enough to measure accurately.

_________________
Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right - Robert Hunter


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:07 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:12 pm
Posts: 6994
First name: Mike
Last Name: O'Melia
City: Huntsville
State: Alabama
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
If you really want to warp your head... we can go back to the discussion of Go-Bars and maximum normal force (turns out for a 1/4" fiberglass Go-Bar, you get about 7 pounds of normal force no matter how much deflection)

I actually understand that.

What I don't understand is why they are called Go-Bars.

Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 3:46 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:36 am
Posts: 7474
Location: Southeast US
City: Lenoir City
State: TN
Zip/Postal Code: 37772
Country: US
Focus: Repair
Mike O'Melia wrote:
...
What I don't understand is why they are called Go-Bars.

Mike


laughing6-hehe

_________________
Steve Smith
"Music is what feelings sound like"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 4:47 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2011 1:32 pm
Posts: 3470
First name: Alex
Last Name: Kleon
City: Whitby
State: Ontario
Zip/Postal Code: L1N8X2
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
SteveSmith wrote:
Mike O'Melia wrote:
...
What I don't understand is why they are called Go-Bars.

Mike


laughing6-hehe


Because they go flying past your head if you aren't careful?

Alex

_________________
"Indecision is the key to flexibility" .... Bumper sticker


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 14, 2014 5:31 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 10:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Gore
City: Sydney
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
J De Rocher wrote:
I'm sure you're right about linearity at small deflections. From what I've read, it seems that the weights people use for this are in the neighborhood of five pounds. I didn't want to double that to ten pounds because I expected it would give very non-linear results. I chose those weights to bracket five pounds. It would be interesting to know at about what amount of deflection the transition to non-linearity occurs with a setup like Ed's. It seems there would be a sweet spot where the deflections would be in the linear range and be big enough to measure accurately.

One of the advantages of using a tap method (dynamic vs. static) to work out the stiffness (Young's modulus) is that you don't get excessive deflections. I find it's quicker, too. It relies on having rectangular, flat wood of uniform thickness, same as deflection (static) methods.

_________________
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.

http://www.goreguitars.com.au


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mikeyb2 and 18 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com